Search Results for "corruption charges"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "corruption charges"

874 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 874 result(s)

High Court

High Court declined to quash the FIR Against Advocate in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Settlement not applicable. The court held that the applicant, not being a public servant, could not be charged under Sections 7 and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 However case of abatement made out and therefore section 12 of PC Act sustained

10 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from an FIR registered against the applicant, an advocate, for offences under Sections 7, 12, and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony was not corroborated and recovery of tainted money was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

30 Aug 2023

The appellant, Babarao Shyamrao Vitalkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No.5/1996 for offences under Section 7 and Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Eligibility Communication Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Interpretation of Section 9(c) of DTVSV Act: Pending criminal proceedings without charge-sheet or not relating to tax matters do not bar eligibility.

23 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of a communication dated 21st October 2020 issued by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

2 Sep 2016

The appellant, Purushottam Raghunath Kulkarni, was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

18 Jan 2016

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (Appellant No.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony insufficient to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

18 Jan 2016

The case pertains to two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (accused no.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (accused no.2), who were convicted by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Vice Principal in Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that the petitioner, being a public servant, cannot be prosecuted without prior sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

21 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Ramchandra S/o Munjaji Bhise, was working as Vice Principal of Digambarrao Bindu Arts and Commerce College at Bhokar, District Nan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Vice Principal in Corruption Case — Demand of Fees for University Admission Not a Bribe Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Fees collected as per university rules for study center admission do not constitute illegal gratification under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

21 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Ramchandra Munjaji Bhise, was the Vice Principal of Digambarrao Bindu Arts and Commerce College, Bhokar, which also ran a study ce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses CBI Revision Against Dropping of Charges Against Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Chavan in Adarsh Housing Society Scam. Court holds that sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and its absence vitiates proceedings.

19 Nov 2014

The case pertains to the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society scam, where government land admeasuring about 3758 sq.mtrs in Block-VI at Colaba, Mumbai, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

4 Oct 2013

The appellant, Eknath s/o Laxman Gaikwad, was a Lineman (Assistant Lineman) employed at the Fuse Call Centre of Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)