Search Results for "contributory pension scheme"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Pension Grant to Scheme Employees Under Uttar Pradesh Cane Service Rules. Employees of Antar Gramin Sadak Nirman Yojana Held Entitled to Pension and Retiral Benefits as Per Government Decisions and Precedent in Vinod Kumar Goel.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 18.05.2016, which held that employees appointed under the Antar Gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pension Benefits Case Under Regularisation Rules. Employee Not Entitled to Old Pension Scheme as Initial Appointment Was on Contract Basis and Regularisation Was Prospective Under Rule 6 of Regularisation Rules, 2011.

The dispute centered on the entitlement of an employee to pensionary benefits under the old pension scheme following the regularisation of his service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions for Pensionary Benefits to Shikshan Sevaks under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Primary Schools (Conduct of Service) Rules, 2014. Held that service as Shikshan Sevak counts towards qualifying service for pension.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by Shikshan Sevaks (teachers) employed in Zilla Parishad schools in Maharashtra. The petitioners, Vij...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IFCI's Appeal Against Retirees' Claim for Enhanced Pension Under VRS-2008. Voluntary Retirement Scheme's Full and Final Settlement Clause Bars Subsequent Claims for Pay Revision Benefits.

The dispute pertains to thirty-one employees of IFCI who voluntarily retired under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2008 (VRS-2008) on 1 February 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unauthorised Absence from Qualifying Service for Pension in DTC VRS Cases. The court held that period of absence without authorisation cannot be counted towards qualifying service for pension under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, even if employee availed VRS.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) against the respondents, ex-employees who had availed of the Vol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits by Counting Prior Service with Board Under Rule 46(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Resignation to Take Up Another Appointment with Permission Does Not Forfeit Past Service

The Petitioner, Smt. Nagaveni R., filed a writ petition seeking pension and other retiral benefits by counting her service from 25.2.1975 to 5.11.1984...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Teacher Seeking Pension Benefits in Kendriya Vidyalaya Pension Case Due to Cut-off Date. Cut-off Date of 1st January, 1986 for Pension Eligibility Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Sindhu Vishwanath Phadake, joined service as a teacher in Adarsh Vidya Bhavan School on 1st November, 1957 and worked until 24th June,...