Search Results for "continuous hostile possession"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Land Grabbing Case Due to Application of Res Judicata. Prior Civil Court Decree Conclusively Determined Title and Possession, Barring Re-litigation Under Section 8 of Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982.

The dispute originated from an application filed by the legal heirs of S.V. Srinivasulu Naidu under Section 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Adverse Possession Dispute Over 70-Year-Old Land Title Conflict. The Court held that the appellant had perfected title by adverse possession despite not being the true owner, based on continuous possession from 1963 to 1981 as shown in revenue records.

The dispute originated from a 1942 purchase of suit properties by Krishnamurthy S. Setlur (KS) through his general power of attorney, H.R. Narayana Iy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Adverse Possession Case — Declares Plaintiff Owner of Encroached Land. Court Holds That Mere Long Possession Without Hostility and Knowledge Does Not Confer Title by Adverse Possession Under Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mallikarjunaiah, filed a civil suit seeking declaration of title and injunction in respect of certain agricultural lands, including 1 G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Holding That Defendant No. 2 Failed to Establish Adverse Possession Over Suit Property. The Court Set Aside Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts and Remanded the Matter for Fresh Consideration on the Issue of Adverse Possession.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit filed by the plaintiff (Sitaram) against defendants no. 1 (Pandharinath) and no. 2 (Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Forest Land Adverse Possession Claim — No Title by Adverse Possession Against Government Over Forest Land Without Notification Under Section 4 of Indian Forest Act, 1927.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff, Rambhau Mhatarba Fud, against the dismissal of his sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit for Possession. Partition Deed of 1951 Held Not Proved, and Plaintiffs Failed to Establish Title and Possession Over Suit House.

The case involves a property dispute between two branches of the Lohi family. The plaintiffs, sons and daughter of late Sheshrao Lohi, filed a suit fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trust Property Dispute — Possession of Suit Plot Not Acquired by Government. Land Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Include the Suit Plot, Hence Government Cannot Claim Title or Possession Without Proper Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 25.9.1995 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal, dismissing Special Civil Suit No.86/1994 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Ownership and Possession. Counterclaim for Ownership Based on Adverse Possession Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Hostile Possession and Ouster of True Owners.

The case involves a property dispute between two sets of parties over a house and land in Bicholim, Goa. The respondents/plaintiffs (Shaikh Mohammad A...