Search Results for "confirmation order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "confirmation order"

2330 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2330 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Confirmation of Share Transfer in Wound-Up Company Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Evidence. Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 requires timely application and proof of bona fide transfer before winding up order.

22 Feb 2012

The appellant, Rathnam P.V., filed an appeal against the order of the Company Judge dismissing his application under Section 536(2) of the Companies A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Probationary Constable in CISF. Petitioner Contends Discharge Was Stigmatic and Without Enquiry; Respondents Argue It Was Simpliciter Under Rule 25(2) of CISF Rules, 2001.

23 Jul 2013

The petitioner, a Constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stay on Appointment of Special Auditor Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Order under Section 81(3)(c) for Test Audit Held Administrative, Not Quasi-Judicial, Hence Revision Under Section 154 Not Maintainable.

10 May 2024

The petitioners, complainants, sought a test audit of respondent No.6 society under Section 81(3)(c) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 196...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Society's Refusal to Grant Membership to Purchaser of Premises. Registered Sale Deed Holder Entitled to Membership Under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Despite Developer's Objection.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioners, Apna Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Deputy General Manager, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Supply of Vital Material and Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation. Preventive detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as statements of key witness not furnished to detenu, violating Article 22(5) right to make effective representation.

31 Jul 2024

The appellant, wife of detenu Appisseril Kochu Mohammed Shaji, challenged the detention order dated 31.08.2023 passed under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Wrongful Preventive Detention Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 — Detention Order Invalid for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Regarding Public Order. The court held that the absence of subjective satisfaction in the detention order rendered it invalid, entitling the petitioner to compensation for the period of detention.

13 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Yuvraj Ramchandra Pawar, was detained under an order dated 2nd December 2013 passed by the District Magistrate, Satara, under Section ...

High Court

High Court of Madras Adjudicates Commercial Suit for Recovery of Outstanding Dues from Pharmaceutical Company. Suit Filed Under Order VII Rule 1 of O.S. Rules 1956 read with Order VII Rule 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Seeking Payment of Rs.1,43,09,216 Based on Alleged Supply of Raw Materials and Confirmation Statements.

17 Feb 2025

The plaintiff, a sole proprietor supplying chemicals, filed a commercial suit for recovery of Rs.1,43,09,216 against the defendant company and its man...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA — Upholds Validity of Section 5(1) Attachment Without Prior Show Cause Notice. Court holds that provisional attachment under Section 5(1) of PMLA is an interim measure and does not require prior hearing, as the Act provides for post-decisional hearing under Section 8.

24 Nov 2025

The petitioners, Mr. Naresh T. Jain and two companies, challenged a provisional attachment order dated 30th September 2021 passed by the Director of E...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Extension of Time to Deposit Sale Consideration in Specific Performance Decree. Doctrine of Merger Applies When Appellate Court Restores Trial Court Decree Without Fixing Time for Deposit.

10 Feb 2025

The case involves four connected civil appeals arising from a common judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dated 09.09.2022, which dismissed ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)