Search Results for "confession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "confession"

811 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 811 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Procedural Defects. Conviction under Sections 363, 302, and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, was overturned as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on unreliable confession and lack of corroborative evidence.

25 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 9th July 2024 by the Special Judge (POCSO), Thane, convicting the appellant under Sections 363, 302, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

14 Nov 2025

The appellant, Manohar Ketkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, for the murder of his wife Manisha under Section 302 IPC and se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence Due to Lack of Conclusive Proof. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

2 May 2025

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.100180/2021 filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 377(1)(b) CrPC seeking enhancement of sent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Wildlife Offence Case Based on Confessional Statements and Recoveries. Confessional statements made to forest officers under Section 50 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 are admissible and sufficient for conviction when corroborated by recovery of wild animal meat and weapons.

5 Oct 2023

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by five accused (Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13) challenging their conviction and sentence under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Wildlife Offence Case — Confessional Statements and Seizures Held Admissible Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The court dismissed the revision application challenging the conviction under Sections 9, 27, 29, 31 read with Section 51(1) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 for hunting Chitals in Nagzira Forest.

5 Oct 2023

The judgment arises from a criminal revision application filed by five accused (original accused Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13) challenging their convicti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Teakwood Transport Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Revision Dismissed for Lack of Evidence of Ownership or Innocent Possession. The court held that the burden under Section 69 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shifts to the accused once possession of forest produce is established, and the applicant failed to rebut the presumption that the teakwood was government property.

5 Oct 2023

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Shrikrishna Rambhau Orivkar, who was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Teakwood Transport Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Revision Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence of Ownership or Authorization. The court held that the burden of proof under Section 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shifts to the accused once possession of timber is established, and the applicant failed to prove lawful possession.

5 Oct 2023

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Shrikrishna Rambhau Orivkar, who was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola, on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Based on Extra-Judicial Confession and Circumstantial Evidence. Appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as extra-judicial confession to informant and father-in-law, recovery of body, and motive established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

12 Feb 2020

The appellant, Mohammad Ismail Noormohammad Madana, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Zuber Mohd. Ismai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

27 Apr 2010

The appellant, Chandrakant Digambar Tanksale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Mohan, his cousin, and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Appellants in Infanticide Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove murder beyond reasonable doubt.

5 Apr 2010

The appellants, Shantaram Raikar/Gaonkar and Shashikala Raikar/Gaonkar, were convicted by the Children's Court, Panaji, for the murder of their newbor...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)