Search Results for "concurrent revisionary jurisdiction"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Rules on Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order on Tenancy Claim Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The decision addresses the validity of the tenancy declaration under Section 70(b) and Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, who claimed to be Watandars, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order passed by the Maharashtra Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses HPCL's Revision Against Eviction Decree in Lease Renewal Dispute. HPCL's Claim of Statutory Right to Renew Lease Under Section 7(3) of Caltex Act Rejected as Lease Was Not Renewed Before Expiry of Original Term.

The case involves a dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), the revision applicant, and the legal heirs of Mansukhlal Doshi, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award; Limits Court Intervention in Arbitration Scope of judicial intervention in arbitration is limited under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Acts and Sections Discussed: Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34: Application for setting aside an arbitral award. Section 37: Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Protected Tenants for Violating Tenancy Laws by Alienating Agricultural Land. Concurrent findings of violation of Sections 19, 40, and 48A of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 upheld.

The dispute pertains to agricultural land measuring Ac.13.02 guntas in Survey No.92, Ac.1.02 guntas in Survey No.93, and 28 guntas in Survey No.95 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence of Bus Driver for Breaking Railway Crossing Gate Under Section 160(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Conviction Upheld but Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone Due to Nature of Offence and Passage of Time.

The appellant, Nagaraj, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. On 3 August 2006, while driving a bus, he hit a railw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Tenancy Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that petitioners failed to prove tenancy rights under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 upheld.

The petitioners, Pradip Vasudeo Ekbote and others, filed four writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order...