Search Results for "complainant's remedy"

992 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 992 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Complainant not required to prove service obtained for self-employment livelihood unless appellant proves commercial purpose.

Consumer Protection - Maintainability of Complaint - Definition of Consumer - Service obtained for Commercial Purpose - Onus of Proof - Burden of Proo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Transfer Order Against DGP in Criminal Writ Petition Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Investigation Transferred to CBI as Both Parties Consented to Ensure Impartiality Under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The proceedings originated from an order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh dated 9 January 2024, which directed the transfer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship Over 10 Years. Long-Standing Relationship Without Complaint Indicates Consent, Not Rape Under Section 376 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Mahesh Damu Khare against the order of the Bombay High Court which had dismissed his petition under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Interim Order — No Willful Disobedience Established as Accused Complied with Order to Restore Water Connection Within Time Granted.

The complainant, Kishin T. Panjabi, filed a contempt petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Shifts Burden on Accused, Which Was Not Discharged.

The appellant, Mohammad Murtuza Mohammad Yusuf, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondent, G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when cheque and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to prove defence.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Sukhalal Kumar, against the acquittal of the accused, Prakash B. Borkar, under Section 1...