APPEAL NO. 313 OF 2015
1 Dec 2016These appeals arose from a common judgment and order dated 31st March 2015 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in two proceedings: Suit ...
Search Results for "common shareholder"
253 result(s) found
Found 253 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.
4 Jun 2015The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Shareholder Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Share Subscription and Shareholders' Agreement.
30 Nov -0001The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising out of disputes between...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Maintainability of Petition Under Sections 397 and 398 of Companies Act, 1956 Upheld. Transfer of shares during pendency does not automatically defeat petition; court examines bona fides of transfer and retains jurisdiction to grant interim relief.
15 Jul 2005The judgment arises from three appeals against a common order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in two company petitions under Sections 397 and 398 of th...
- 170
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging SFIO Investigation Order in Company Law Non-Compliance Case Involving Family Demerger Dispute. The Court considered whether order dated 6 May 2016 directing investigation into affairs of Singhal Enterprises Private Limited under Section 633 and Article 226 should be quashed amid ongoing litigation.
5 Oct 2016The writ petition was filed by majority shareholders of Singhal Enterprises Private Limited, a Kolkata-based sponge iron manufacturer, against the Add...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Shareholder Dispute Over Share Transfer Agreement — Agreement dated 14th June 2019 Held Valid and Enforceable.
23 Sep 2022The dispute arises out of a Share Purchase Agreement dated 14th June 2019 between the Kamdar Group (appellants) and the Sanghvi Group (respondents) fo...
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Delivers Order on Petition to Quash Criminal Complaint in Share Forgery Case — Allegations of Duplicate Shares and Impersonation Reviewed Under IPC Sections 467 and 418 Without Specific Accusations Against Company Officials
16 Jul 2024This criminal petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by United Spirits Limited, a public limited company, seekin...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Sugar Factory's Petition Against Injunction in Share Forfeiture Dispute. Court holds that forfeiture of shares for non-payment of call money is valid under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act and byelaws, and that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting injunction without considering prima facie case.
29 Jun 2010The petitioner, Shree Vitthal Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, c...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Confirmation of Share Transfer in Wound-Up Company Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Evidence. Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 requires timely application and proof of bona fide transfer before winding up order.
22 Feb 2012The appellant, Rathnam P.V., filed an appeal against the order of the Company Judge dismissing his application under Section 536(2) of the Companies A...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Bombay Declares Transfer Void Under Section 531(1) of Companies Act, 1956 in Winding-Up Proceedings. Related party transaction without registered deed held to be fraudulent preference.
25 Jun 2026The High Court of Bombay, in its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, considered Official Liquidator Report No. 34 of 2025 in Company Petition No. 19...
- 76
