Search Results for "common area maintenance charges"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows SIPCOT's Appeal in Sub-Leasing Dispute — Demand for Sub-Leasing Charges Upheld. Lease Agreement Clause 2(vii) Prohibiting Sub-Leasing Without Consent and Requiring Payment of Charges is Valid and Enforceable.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT) against orders of a learned Single J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Joint Consumer Complaint by Flat Buyers Under Section 12(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Common Grievance Sufficient Despite Different Dates, Costs, and Sizes. NCDRC's Dismissal Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Consideration.

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 19 February 2016, which dismissed a consumer compl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Injunction in Property Dispute Over Passage and Gate. Trial Court Failed to Consider Leave Application Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Before Granting Interim Relief.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by Respondents 1 to 4 (plaintiffs) against the appellant (defendant No.1) and the Municipal Corporation (defendant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.

The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...