Search Results for "cognizance without sanction"

508 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 508 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Police Officers in Criminal Case Due to Lack of Requirement for Prior Sanction. Allegations of Assault and Defamation Not Connected to Official Duties Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 170 Karnataka Police Act, 1963, Thus Sanction Not Mandatory.

The dispute arose from a private complaint filed by the complainant against police officers, alleging assault, torture, defamation, and theft during i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Transfer of MCOC Case to Sessions Court for Lack of Jurisdiction — Offence Not Under MCOC Act. Special Court Correctly Found No Organized Crime Syndicate or Continuing Unlawful Activity Under Section 2(1)(e) and Section 3 of MCOC Act.

The case involves two appeals against an order dated 7th October 2011 passed by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Application in Limitation Bar Case — Charge Sheet Filed Beyond Period of Limitation Under Section 468 CrPC. Cognizance of Offences Under Sections 153-A and 295-A IPC Barred as Charge Sheet Filed After 3 Years from Date of Offence.

The applicants, Shripad Janardan Phadke and Rajendra Jaswantlal Seth, were accused in S.T.C. No. 651/2005 pending before the Judicial Magistrate (Firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...