Search Results for "closure compensation"

311 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 311 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Closure Compensation Award in Industrial Dispute. Court Holds That Discontinuance of Operations Amounts to Closure Under Section 25-FFF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Siemens Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing bogie frames for Indian Railways, employed 99 workmen. On 14.08.2014, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Challenges Human Rights Commission's Order in Road Accident Case -- High Court Quashes Commission's Recommendations as Exceeding Jurisdiction Under Protection of Human Rights Act

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai filed a writ petition challenging the order of Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission dated 19/1/2018 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Industrial Dispute Case, Quashes Reinstatement Orders. Labour Court Failed to Consider Evidence of Voluntary Abandonment of Employment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt Ltd, filed five Special Civil Applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Rent Act Eviction Case — Bonafide Need, Subletting, and Default Established. Trial Court's Eviction Order Restored as Single Judge Erred in Reversing Findings of Fact.

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 22-7-2008 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which reversed the eviction ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award Denying Reinstatement to Employee of Closed Family Welfare Centre. Termination Due to Closure of Establishment Not a Retrenchment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Pradip Patil, was employed as a peon and later as a clerk/storekeeper at the Family Welfare Centre run by Yugantar Education Society i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Not Liable for Wages During Lockout Period Due to Binding Settlement. Settlement Between Union and Employer Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act Precludes Claim for Wages for Period of No Work.

The appellant, M/s. Mehta Gem Tools Private Limited, challenged an order of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 255...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Unfair Labour Practice Orders — Industrial Court's Findings Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer Denied Salary and Benefits to Employees During Strike Period, Constituting Unfair Labour Practices Under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV.

The petitioners, National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra North) Limited and its General Manager, challenged two orders of the Industrial Court at Bo...