Search Results for "brokers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "brokers"

328 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award for Losses Due to Unauthorized Squaring Off of Positions. The court held that the arbitral award was based on evidence and reasoning, and no ground for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was made out.

5 Mar 2012

The case involves a challenge by HSBC InvestDirect Securities (India) Ltd. (formerly IL & FS Investsmart Securities Ltd.), a stock broker registered w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Finding That Trades Were Authorized by Client. Court holds that under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitral award is not patently illegal or perverse and does not warrant interference.

17 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Sharma, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute for Lack of Reasons and Non-Consideration of Margin Requirements. Award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 set aside as Arbitrator failed to consider deposit and margin obligations of client.

27 Feb 2012

The Petitioner, Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers Ltd., a share and stock broker and member of NSE, challenged an arbitral award dated 15 October 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Arbitration Petitions in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Holds That Non-Signatories Can Be Referred to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The court applied the group of companies doctrine to refer non-signatory appellants to arbitration, finding that they were closely connected to the signatory broker and the transactions were indivisible.

7 Apr 2021

The case involves four appeals filed by members of the Madgavkar family (Anil V. Madgavkar, Celsa A. Madgavkar, Ayesha A. Madgavkar, and Aakash A. Mad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles.

23 Dec 2025

This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Release from Investor Protection Fund Due to Client Code Mismatch. Claim Rejected as Contract Notes Did Not Match Trade Files of Stock Exchange.

27 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Saurin T. Parikh, proprietor of Shah Investment, filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 25th May 2005 passed by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act — Upholds Broker's Right to Square Off Client Positions Without T+1 Notice Under Member Client Agreement. The court held that the arbitral award was not perverse or contrary to public policy as the broker acted in accordance with the contract terms.

26 Apr 2016

The appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant/broker) a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of Trading Member for Violating Gross Exposure Limits and Failing to Maintain Capital Adequacy. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 22F - Appeal against Securities Appellate Tribunal order upholding expulsion from National Stock Exchange membership.

20 Nov 2020

The appellant, Rusoday Securities Ltd., was a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) since November 1994 and gave an undert...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Monarch Research and Brokerage Private Limited and Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited with Networth Stock Broking Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 — Objection by Gold Castle Realtor Dismissed as Not a Creditor or Member.

7 Aug 2014

The judgment concerns two Company Scheme Petitions (CSP 575/2012 and CSP 576/2012) filed by Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited (2nd Transferor Com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — Limitation Period Under Bye-law 252(2) Starts from Date of Last Transaction, Not Subsequent Meetings. Claim for Rs. 78.63 lakhs arising from debit of Rs. 1.17 crores on 12 February 2008 held barred by limitation as claim was not filed within six months of last transaction.

25 Sep 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 1 October 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)