Search Results for "bribe allegation"

236 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 236 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 28...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquitted Accused in Bribery Case Due to Lack of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Established – Conviction and Sentence Set Aside – Prosecution’s Case Collapsed Due to Inconsistent Evidence �...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, P. Somaraju, was an Assistant Commissioner of Labour in Hyderabad. The complainant, S. Venkat Reddy (PW-1), a licensed labour contracto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Health Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Anil Ramchandra Orape, a Health Inspector with the Pune Municipal Corporation, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune on 30/12/1997 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Education Officer in Bribery Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Harishchandra Prabhakar Borkar, was the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Nagpur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Complainant's Testimony is Unreliable Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Laxman s/o Narayan Kale, a government servant working with Nagpur Improvement Trust, was convicted by the Special Judge for demanding a...