Search Results for "bona fide decision"

1405 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1405 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Claimants in Railway Accident Case — Holds That Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Was Accidental. The Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Grounds of Untruthful Evidence and Failure to Prove 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The present appeal was filed by the original applicants, the widow and minor children of Jagannath Vibhute, challenging the judgment and award dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Mother of Deceased Entitled to Compensation Under Railways Act. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of Non-Existence of Deceased as Passenger, Despite Evidence of Accidental Fall from Train.

The appellant, Ranjanabai Tukaram Jatale, mother of deceased Suresh Tukaram Jatale, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Death of Passenger Due to Accidental Fall from Train. Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Occurred in a Railway Accident.

The present appeal was filed by the original applicants, Nagorao s/o Gangaram Kamble and Sow. Vithabai w/o Nagorao Kamble, challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Admission of Winding Up Petition Due to Bona Fide Counterclaim. Company's claim for damages exceeding admitted debt constitutes a substantial defence under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appellant, Prime Broking Company (India) Ltd., appealed against an order dated 28 June 2016 passed by the Company Judge admitting a winding up pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Admission of Winding Up Petition Due to Bona Fide Counterclaim. Company's claim for damages exceeding admitted debt constitutes a substantial defence under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appellant, Prime Broking Company (India) Ltd., appealed against an order dated 28 June 2016 passed by the Company Judge admitting a winding up pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Tenancy Rights in Third Round of Litigation. Respondent's Adoption by Widow Before Tillers Day Confers Tenancy Rights Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The case involves a long-standing dispute over tenancy rights in two agricultural lands (Survey No.37/4 and 38/6) in Village Kharshi, Satara District....