Search Results for "benami property"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "benami property"

137 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Second Appeal Against Decree Granting Declaration and Possession; Operative Part Missing. The appeal challenges the first appellate court's reversal of the trial court's dismissal, but the judgment's conclusion is not provided.

27 Apr 2026

The dispute involves a regular second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the appellants (original defendants) bef...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment in Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Jamma Malai Lands as Forest Land. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Conservator of Forests' Order Forfeiting Rights Under Section 82 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Earlier Judicial Decrees.

17 Feb 2026

The writ petition challenged the order dated 16.12.2011 passed by the Conservator of Forests, Kodagu, declaring the petitioners' Jamma Malai lands as ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition in Benami Transaction Dispute; Quashes Orders Lacking Specific Direction to Beneficial Owner to Respond. The Court Holds that Under Section 24 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, the Revenue Must Explicitly Call Upon the Beneficial Owner to Furnish Explanation When Issuing Copy of Notice.

26 Sep 2025

The petitioner, a beneficial owner in an alleged benami transaction, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Communication Restraining Property Transfer Without Authority of Law. Communication directing society not to permit transfer of flat without NOC from Customs held without legal sanction and violative of Article 300A of Constitution.

5 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Supriya Chokhara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bom...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Benami Transaction Suit — Father-Son Relationship Constitutes Fiduciary Capacity Under Section 4(3)(b) of Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when exception is pleaded.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the rejection of the plaint by the trial court and the High Court. The appellant, Pawan Kumar, filed a su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Benami Transaction, Limitation, and Specific Relief Issues Require Trial. The court held that grounds under Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, and Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be decided at the threshold under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC without evidence.

22 Mar 2018

The present civil revision application arises from a suit filed by respondent No.1 (plaintiff) against his sister (defendant No.1) and others seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Purchaser in Pending Eviction Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Impleadment Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Purchaser of suit property during pendency of litigation is entitled to be impleaded to protect her interest, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 only binds the purchaser by the decree, not prohibits impleadment.

19 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Minalini Lalit Modi, purchased the suit flat from the tenant (respondent no.2) during the pendency of an eviction suit filed by the la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit Between Brothers — Unregistered Memorandum of Partition Admissible to Prove Nature of Possession. The court held that an unregistered partition deed, though required to be registered under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, is admissible under the proviso to Section 49 to prove the nature and character of possession as a collateral transaction.

26 Sep 2016

The dispute in this second appeal arises between two real brothers over a suit plot and house at Subhash Nagar, Nagpur. The plaintiff-respondent (sinc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Will and Gift Deed Validity. Court sets aside concurrent findings of courts below, remands matter for fresh consideration on issue of due execution of gift deed and will.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Surekha Murgendra Kalyanshetti, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree of the District Court, Kolhapur, which dismissed ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)