Search Results for "belated FIR"

222 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 222 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 326 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vishnu S/o Jagganath Gund, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed for the murder of Raosaheb Bhau Dukare and causing grie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case Arising from Land Dispute. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 506(II) read with Section 149 IPC confirmed for active participants in fatal assault, while acquittal of other accused upheld for lack of evidence.

The case arises from a land dispute between two families in Dhol Umari, Hingoli. On 18th May 2014, the informant Dipak Khandare and his family members...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Sections 498A, 302, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty and murder beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pankaj Ramesh Patil, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife Manisha and for cruelty and causing disappearance of e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Money Lending and Forgery Case Due to Malafide Complaint and Suppression of Facts. Repeated complaint on same allegations after earlier quashing amounts to abuse of process under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicants, Anup Dodiya and Niranjan Dodiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case — No Proximate Link Between Applicant's Conduct and Suicide. Allegations of harassment for repayment of loan do not constitute abetment under Section 306 IPC as there was no direct instigation or active participation.

The applicant, Rahul s/o Bapu More, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation to CBI in Private Land Dispute. Court holds that a private dispute over purchase of a plot of land does not warrant transfer of investigation to CBI or registration of FIR under Section 156(3) CrPC.

The petitioner, Rajendra Shamraoji Padole, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking transfer of investigatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Section 156(3) Order in Stockbroker-Client Dispute. Dispute over share transactions held to be civil, not criminal, under Section 409 IPC.

The petitioners, Nirmal Bang Securities Private Limited (a stockbroking company) and its directors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...