Search Results for "armed forces tribunal"

173 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between family members. The appellants in SA-284-2019 were the original defendant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Ex-Sepoy Discharged on Medical Grounds Without Invalidating Board. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954 requires Invalidating Board; failure renders discharge illegal.

The appellant, Ex-Sepoy (Washerman) Ram Khilawan, was enrolled in the Indian Army on October 23, 1987. He was placed in permanent Low Medical Category...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Washerman Discharged on Medical Grounds Without Invalidating Board. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954 requires Invalidating Board recommendation; residual clause (v) inapplicable.

The appellant, Ex-Sepoy (Washerman) Ram Khilawan, was enrolled in the Indian Army on October 23, 1987. He was discharged from service on August 31, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal, Restores Dismissal of Army Sepoy for 302-Day Unauthorized Absence. Armed Forces Tribunal's Reduction of Punishment to Notional Service for Pension Held Erroneous.

The respondent, Ex. No.6492086A Sep/Ash Kulbeer Singh, was enrolled in the Indian Army as a Sepoy on 25 April 1996. On 11 November 2007, he was posted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Navy Service Matter Due to Alternative Remedy. Petitioner, a Chief Petty Officer, Directed to Approach Armed Forces Tribunal Under Section 3(o) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 for Challenge to Release Order.

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, a Chief Petty Officer in the Indian Navy, challenged an order dated 26 June 2015 releasing him from service effective 31 J...