Search Results for "alcohol influence"

265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case - Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Setting Wife on Fire Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence.

The appellant, Kakasaheb Mohiniraj Khatik, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Bebi, and senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration Despite Initial Exculpatory Statement. Kerosene Smell and Medical Evidence Corroborate Guilt Under Sections 302 and 506 IPC.

The appellant, Jagbir Singh, was convicted under Sections 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the murder of his wife, Santosh, by pouring ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Murder. The Appeal Challenges the Trial Court's Verdict Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen and Recovery of Weapon.

The present criminal appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the judgment and order dated 15t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Fatal Assault Case. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC for causing death by hitting deceased with a wooden log after a quarrel, reducing sentence from 10 years to 7 years.

The appellant, Balaji Devidas More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide and Murder in Family Tragedy Case. Appellant convicted under Section 306 IPC for wife's suicide and under Section 302 IPC for murder of two children based on circumstantial evidence and dying declaration.

The appellant, Jivan Seha @ Jaisingh Solanki, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, District Thane, in Sessions Case No. 67 of 2000...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellant in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused drove in a rash or negligent manner causing death.

The appellant, Sagar Lolienkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, South Goa, Margao, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and ...