Search Results for "admiralty jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "admiralty jurisdiction"

116 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 116 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Application by Merchant Vessel Owner to Limit Liability Under Part XA of Merchant Shipping Act Following Collision with Indian Navy Vessel. The Court Examined Whether the Right to Limit Liability is Absolute and Whether the Owner’s Alleged Negligence or Recklessness Could Defeat the Limitation.

17 Feb 2023

The present proceedings arose out of a collision on 30 January 2011 between the merchant vessel M.V.Nordlake, owned by the German-incorporated Plainti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Port Authority's Appeal in Admiralty Suit Over Port Dues and Anchorage Charges. Auction purchaser liable for port dues and anchorage charges for period vessel remained in port after delivery, as per Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 and scale of rates.

12 Feb 2021

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai (MbPT) against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit — Vessel Arrest Set Aside for Lack of Same Beneficial Ownership. The court held that the arrest of a vessel under admiralty jurisdiction requires proof that the vessel is in the same beneficial ownership as the charterer liable for the claim, and mere common control or management is insufficient.

9 Dec 2019

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A. Panama, the registered owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, against an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit for Lack of Maritime Claim — Charterer's Claim for Sub-Charterer's Expenses Not a Maritime Lien. The court held that a claim for damages arising from a sub-charterer's expenses due to arrest of the chartered vessel by a third party does not constitute a maritime claim under the Admiralty Act, 2017, and the vessel cannot be arrested for such a claim.

6 Jun 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the Applicant, the owner of the vessel M.V. AODABAO (Defendant No. 1), seeking to vacate the order of ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit for Bunker Supply Debt. Bunker Suppliers Have Maritime Lien Under Indian Law and Admiralty Court Has Jurisdiction to Arrest Vessel for Necessaries Supplied.

8 Jul 2014

The plaintiff, Rushab Ship International LLC, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M.V. African Eagle and others for recovery of USD 1,00,000 be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

20 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Foreign Vessel in Admiralty Suit — Plaintiffs' Claim for Supply of Bunkers and Stores Falls Within Admiralty Jurisdiction Under Section 4(1) of the Admiralty Act, 2017.

11 Feb 2014

The plaintiffs, Universal Marine and Ramanand Padiyar, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M.T. Hartati (a Singapore-flagged vessel) and its ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short-Landed Cargo Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the consignment was loaded on board the vessel and that the suit was barred by limitation under the Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

27 Sep 2013

The plaintiff, Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of US$154,000 representing the CIF value of 40 drums of Lincomycin HCL BP ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit for Arrest of Vessel Based on Beneficial Ownership. Court holds that under the International Convention on Arrest of Ships, 1999, a maritime claimant can arrest a vessel beneficially owned by the same person who owns the charterer-debtor, even if the vessel is registered in a different name.

2 Jul 2013

The appellant, Lufeng Shipping Company Ltd., a Chinese company, had a maritime claim of US$ 1,628,658.07 against respondent No.2, Whim Star Chartering...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)