Search Results for "Tribunal award restored"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Tribunal award restored"

542 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 542 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside District Court's Order That Had Set Aside Arbitral Award on Grounds Beyond Section 34 Scope. The Court Held That Reappreciation of Evidence Is Not Permissible Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the District Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.

21 Nov 2019

The appellant, M/s. Scigen Biopharma Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Land Sale Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Petition Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence and That Award Was Not Perverse.

30 Aug 2019

The case involves an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment of the Principal Dist...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Award declared firm dissolved on a date not claimed by any party and failed to consider crucial evidence regarding partnership property.

5 Jun 2017

The Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges an arbitral award dated 1st August 2006. The petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

30 Jan 2023

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matters — Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Setting Aside Award and Remanding for Reconsideration Without Finding Award to Be Void or Inoperative. The Court Held That Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Confer Power of Remand; Only Remedies Are to Uphold, Modify, or Set Aside the Award.

25 Jun 2013

The appellant, Geojit Financial Services Limited (now Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services Limited), a stock broker registered with the National Stoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Domain Name Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice. Lack of Proper Notice to Registrant Renders Award Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Telepathy Inc., a US-based company, was the registrant of the domain name 'fls.in' registered on 24 March 2005. Respondent No.5, Flsmi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Restoration of Majority Award on Escalation Clause Interpretation. Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 Not Attracted as Arbitral Interpretation of Contract Clause Was Plausible.

5 Apr 2006

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside a majority arbitral award under Section 30 of the Arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Municipal Council's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award on Permanency and Equal Pay. Court Upholds Permanency for Workmen Completing 180 Days and Daily Wage Calculation at 1/26th of Monthly Salary Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

31 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shrirampur Municipal Council, a local body constituted under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats & Industrial Townshi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Indian Oil Corporation in Dealership Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award. The court held that the Single Judge exceeded jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by reappreciating evidence and substituting his own view for the arbitrator's plausible findings.

10 Oct 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 25 March 2013, which set aside an arbitral award under Secti...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)