Search Results for "Trademark Rectification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Trademark Rectification"

58 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark for Non-Use and Discrepancy in User Date — Ayyappan Brand Registration Expunged. The court held that failure to prove use of the mark as registered and unexplained discrepancy in user date warrant removal under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s.Sree Lakshmi Balaji Industries, filed a petition under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking removal/rect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5000'. The court held that the Plaintiff's registered trademarks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND' were infringed by the Defendants' use of 'COX 5000', and the Defendants were restrained from using the impugned mark.

8 Dec 2025

The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, Jagpin Brewerise Limited & Ors., fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case, Restrains Defendants from Selling Allegedly Copied Books. Court finds prima facie case of substantial copying of plaintiff's literary works on Indian Economy and Polity by former students.

25 Oct 2024

The appellant, Ranjan Vasudeo Kolambe, filed a Commercial Appeal From Order under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging the judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Design Infringement Case, Modifying Consent Decree Due to Typographical Error. The Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the application under Sections 152 and 153 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as a misunderstanding between parties warranted correction of the Settlement Agreement to reflect the intended trademark 'FX-991ES PLUS'/'FX-991'.

4 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the Respondent against the Appellant for design infringement and trademark violation regarding scientific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as Not Arbitrary or Perverse.

9 Oct 2020

The appeal arises from an order of the trial court granting a temporary injunction in favor of the respondent/plaintiff, M/s Mysore Deep Perfumery Hou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.

2 Jul 2019

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in Beer Product Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAYWARDS 5000' held to be deceptively similar to Defendant's 'COX 5001', warranting protection pending trial.

6 Feb 2014

The plaintiff, Sabmiller India Limited, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the defendant, Jagpin Breweries Ltd., for infringing its r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave Under Clause XIV Letters Patent to Combine Passing Off with Infringement Cause of Action to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings. The court held that once jurisdiction over infringement is established, leave to combine passing off claim should be granted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

18 Jan 2014

The Plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and Another, filed a suit for infringement of their registered trademarks, including 'UltraTech Cement', and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Injunction Against Trademark Threat in 'HOKEY POKEY' Dispute. Prior Registration of Defendant's Mark Under Class 30 Prevents Passing Off Claim Despite Plaintiff's Subsequent Use.

1 Jul 2011

The plaintiff, Drums Food International Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit seeking a declaration that a cease and desist notice issued by the defendants, Euro Ic...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)