Search Results for "Trade Marks Registry"

141 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 141 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Descriptive Mark 'OCTRIDE'. Court holds that the mark is descriptive of the active ingredient Octreotide and lacks distinctiveness, and balance of convenience favors the defendant.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, filed a commercial IP suit seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant, United Biotech Pri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cancellation of Trademark 'PAXIL' for Non-Use Under Section 47 of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Petitioner's Global Reputation and Prior Use Established 'Person Aggrieved' Status.

The Petitioner, Glaxo Group Limited, a global pharmaceutical company, filed a petition under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 seeking cancellat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Use of 'KATARIA INSURANCE' Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Marks 'KATARIA' and 'KATARIA INSURANCE CONSULTANCY' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Bhavesh Suresh Kataria, proprietor of Kataria Jewellery Insurance Consultancy, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Protecting Consumer Clarity in Pharmaceutical Markets

The case involves a dispute over trademark infringement between the plaintiff's "ZITA-MET" and the defendant's "XIGAMET" in the pharmaceutical sector....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as Not Arbitrary or Perverse.

The appeal arises from an order of the trial court granting a temporary injunction in favor of the respondent/plaintiff, M/s Mysore Deep Perfumery Hou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...