Search Results for "Tahsildar Recommendation"

63 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 63 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Encroacher Seeking Land Exchange. Encroacher Cannot Claim Exchange of Land as an Absolute Right; Government Land Encroachment Must Be Evicted Following Due Process.

The petitioner, Mariammal, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15.08.2024 passed by the Thasildar (3rd respondent) rejecting her claim fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Encroacher Seeking Land Exchange. Encroacher Cannot Claim Exchange of Land as an Absolute Right; Government Land Encroachment Must Be Evicted Following Due Process.

The petitioner, Mariammal, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging an order dated 15.08.2024 passed by the Thasildar (third res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Punishment Order in Service Dispute Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence. Reduction in Pension by Three Stages for 10 Years Held Disproportionate for Alleged Bribery of Rs.250-300.

The petitioner, R. Vasu, was appointed as an Office Assistant in the Tamil Nadu Revenue Department on 03.05.1986 and later promoted to Junior Assistan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Land Grabbing Case Due to Application of Res Judicata. Prior Civil Court Decree Conclusively Determined Title and Possession, Barring Re-litigation Under Section 8 of Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982.

The dispute originated from an application filed by the legal heirs of S.V. Srinivasulu Naidu under Section 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Freedom Fighter Pension Under Swatantrya Sainik Sanman Pension Scheme. The court held that the petitioner, as widow of an underground freedom fighter, is entitled to pension benefits from 14-08-1995.

The petitioner, Sarubai w/o Narayansinh Thakur, aged 87 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...