Search Results for "Suo Moto Revision"

183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals in Tenancy Suo Moto Revision Case — Limitation Not Applicable to Section 84C Powers. Concurrent findings of fact by revenue authorities cannot be interfered with under Article 227 unless perverse.

The case involves a set of intra-court appeals (Letters Patent Appeals) filed against a common judgment dated 21.11.2016 passed by a learned Single Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Collector's Order Changing Gamthal Land to Agricultural Land — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. District Collector lacked authority to convert Gamthal land tenure without notice to landowners under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The writ applicants, Makhansinh Mulji Rajput and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court upholds adherence to statutory rules in electoral roll disputes; Mandamus denied.

The petitioner sought relief from the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, to direct the Election Commission to remove duplicate names in the voters' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Revision After 15 Years Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Anurat Jadhav, a resident of Salimba, filed a return under Section 12 of the Ceiling Act on 1 December 1975, showing total holding of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Land Ceiling Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 16 Years Held Unjustified as Original Order of Non-Surplus Holder Had Attained Finality.

The petitioner, Baban S/o Munjaji Shere, as legal representative of his deceased father Munjaji S/o Manaji, challenged a notice dated 13th July 1992 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years. Inordinate Delay and Violation of Natural Justice Render Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Madan Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Div...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Suo Motu Reopening Notice Under Ceiling Act for Being Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 3 Years Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Strictly Adhered To.

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased Sidram Ganpatrao Solunke, were original land holders in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (...