Search Results for "Substantive appointment"

683 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 683 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Selected Candidate in Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education Recruitment Case. Power of Relaxation Under Rule 18 of R&P Rules Upheld for Candidate with Higher Qualification and Highest Merit Score Despite Lack of Prescribed Work Experience.

The present appeals arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education for the post of Computer Hardware Eng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Held to be Dubai, UAE, Not India, Based on Express Terms of Distributorship Agreement.

The present petition was filed under Section 11(6)(a) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Transfer Order of Government Officer in Town Planning Department — Upholds State's Power of Transfer as an Incident of Service. Transfer Order Issued in Public Interest and Not Vitiated by Malafides or Violation of Statutory Rules.

The petitioner, Shri Noreshwar Raghunathrao Shende, was serving as Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra State, Pune. He was transferred to the post ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Shareholder Suit Challenging Director Appointments for Lack of Jurisdiction. Dispute Over Rights Under Articles of Association Falls Within Exclusive Jurisdiction of Company Law Board Under Companies Act, 1956.

The suit was filed by shareholders of a banking company, Yes Bank, challenging resolutions relating to the appointment of directors and seeking declar...