Search Results for "Structured Formula Compensation"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Application of Burden of Proof Under Section 163A MV Act. Claimant's Failure to Prove Negligence Not a Ground for Dismissal Under No-Fault Liability Scheme.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court dated 27.09.2022, which affirmed the dismissal of a claim petition filed by the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimant's Deceased Was Driving Without Valid License and Was Negligent, Reducing Insurer's Liability Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arises out of a judgment and award dated 06-08-2009 passed by the Additional MACT, Srirangapatna, in MVC No.848/2003, whereby the petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Income Exceeding Limit Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claim Petition Under Section 163-A Held Not Maintainable as Deceased's Annual Income Exceeded Rs.40,000/- Prescribed Limit.

The appellant, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 10/03/2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Incorrect Multiplier and Omission of Future Prospects. Multiplier of 16 Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Deceased Aged 35 Years.

The appeal was filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Chintaman Kolekar, who died in a motor vehicle accident involving a motorcycle and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of a 19-Year-Old Student. Court holds that future prospects must be considered even for non-earning deceased, and multiplier should be based on age of deceased, not claimant.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the appellants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased, a 19-year-old student named Pra...