Search Results for "Sharad Birdhichand Sarda case"

324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Hariomdas Govinddas Bainade, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences punishable under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 309 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Hariomdas Govinddas Bainade, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences punishable under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Improper Investigation. Conviction under SC/ST Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove caste-based insult and arson beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Aba @ Munjaba s/o Rajabhau Giri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 3 of 2013 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Link Between Incident and Accused Not Established. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstances of Last Seen, Motive, Blood-Stained Clothes, and Absconding Did Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt.

The appellant, Sandip Baburao Waidande, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife Nirmala. The inciden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Manoj @ Manya Pandurang Kadam, Pranay @ Pintya Ramesh Pawar, and Pradeep @ Dadya Atmaram Pawar, were convicted by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal in Drowning Deaths of Two Minor Daughters Under Section 302 IPC. Trial Court Had Convicted Appellant and Sentenced Her to Life Imprisonment Based on Circumstantial Evidence of Last Seen Together and Abscondance.

The criminal appeal was filed by Mankarnabai against the judgment dated 26 June 2001 of the Sessions Judge, Dhule, convicting her under Section 302 IP...