Search Results for "Seniority Dispute"

872 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 872 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Seniority List of Graduate High School Teachers — Directs Inclusion of Petitioner with Continuous Service from 1988. Sahitya Sudhakar Qualification Treated as Equivalent to Graduation for Seniority Purposes Under Zilla Parishad Service Rules.

The petitioner, Shri Jaiprakash Baburao Gaidhane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the final seniority li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Education Officer's Order Directing Seniority Revision and Promotion After Petitioner Already Promoted — Education Officer Lacks Jurisdiction Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules Once Promotion Is Granted.

The petitioner, Girish Suresh Jambhalikar, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 10.07.1995 in a school run by respondent No.3 Management. He posse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Policy Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority in High Court Administration. Court upholds that marks in departmental examination are not the sole criterion for promotion and that seniority can be given weightage under the applicable rules.

The petitioner, Kishore D. Raorane, joined the High Court administration on the Original Side as a Clerk in 1985 and retired as Master (Adm) in 2021. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Resolution on Seniority of District Judges Promoted Through Limited Competitive Examination. Merit-Based Seniority Upheld as Administrative Committee's Decision Contravened Supreme Court Directives and Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services Rules, 1994.

The dispute concerned District Judges in Madhya Pradesh who were appointed to the Higher Judicial Services through Limited Competitive Examinations (L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Among Promoted Officers in Telecommunications Engineering Service. ROTA Rule Not Applicable Where Statutory Recruitment Rules Do Not Provide for Rotation of Vacancies Between Quota Streams.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the inter se seniority of Sub-Divisional Engineers (SDEs) in the Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group 'B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pilots' Challenge to Command Training Selection in Air India — No Violation of Articles 14 and 16 Found. Selection based on seniority and merit was not arbitrary; employer's decision to withdraw earlier offer was justified due to operational exigencies.

The petitioners, pilots of Air India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30th September 2004 by wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Seniority Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Police (Civil) Subordinate Service Rules. Inter se Seniority of Sub-Inspectors to be Fixed on Completion of Training as per Rule 15.

The appeals before the Supreme Court arose out of a dispute regarding seniority in the cadre of Sub-Inspectors of Police in the State of Andhra Prades...