Search Results for "Security Cheque"

681 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 681 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Failure to Prove Loan Repayment or Dispute Existence of Debt Leads to Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant-complainant, Sri Krishna Reddy M, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Failure to Rebut Presumption. Appellant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as cheque was issued as security and loan transaction not reflected in income tax returns.

The appellant, Sri Dattatraya, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Sharanappa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Suit for Recovery Based on Dishonoured Cheque Due to Material Alteration. Cheque with discrepancy between figures and words held to be materially altered under Section 87 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, rendering it void against the drawer.

The plaintiff, Suneel Dattatraya Mogre, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against the defendant, Prabhakar Baburao Thorat, seeking a decree for Rs.2,25,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Loan Transaction and Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by Smt. Jayamma @ Nagamma (respondent) against Smt. Jayamma (petitioner/accused) under Section 138 of the Negot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The present criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner, Sri R. Rajappa, challenging the judgment of conviction and order on senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Complainant Company's Loan to Employee and Cheque Issuance for Repayment Established, Rebuttable Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Sami Labs Limited, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondent, M.V. Joseph, a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case, Reduces Fine Amount. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding cheque issued for repayment of loan.

The case arises from a complaint filed by M/s. Meenakshi Developers (respondent/complainant) against Sri V.V. Chari (petitioner/accused) under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...