Search Results for "Section 95(2)"

103 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Small Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim. Court Disposes Appeal Solely on Ground of Meager Amount, Keeping All Legal Issues Open for Other Proceedings.

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. filed a First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Proper Application of Multiplier and Future Prospects. The court recalculated compensation for death of a 35-year-old self-employed person, adding 40% future prospects and applying multiplier of 18, resulting in enhanced award.

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the im...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Deceased Rider Established but Compensation Enhanced. Future Prospects, Multiplier, and Conventional Heads Recalculated as per Pranay Sethi and Sarla Verma.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 20.06.2016, when the deceased Yashawant Dafale was riding a motorcycle bearing registration No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition of Unauthorized Structure Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Affidavit-in-Reply to Notice of Motion Cannot Be Treated as Written Statement.

The appellant, M/s. B. Jayantilal, a partnership firm, filed a suit challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rasiklal Makhanji Solanki, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Vidya Prabhudesai by pouring kerosene and setting her ...