Search Results for "Section 449 IPC"

65 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence and Weak Motive. Conviction based on last seen circumstance, motive, and recovery of knives fails as prosecution evidence is found unreliable and procedure improper.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Malaichamy and another (Accused Nos. 1 and 2) against their conviction for the murder of Harish Kumar, son of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Ocular Evidence. Related Witnesses' Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Discrepancies with Medical Evidence.

The case arises from a murder that occurred on 17 June 1982. The deceased, Sarman Singh, had a prior altercation with accused Lakhan Singh over a land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Arms Act Violation in Land Dispute Shooting. Appellant-accused fired two rounds from a revolver at the deceased, causing death, and the court confirmed life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959.

The case arises from a land dispute that led to a fatal shooting. On 07.06.2012, the complainant and his son Nagjiji were at their agricultural field ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations and Lack of Identity. Dying Declarations Naming Different Person and Contradicting Each Other Render Conviction Unsustainable Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Mustaq Ahmed Ismail Kadari, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Shalu Sudhakar Pagare by setting her on fire. The pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Atrocities Act Offences. Conviction upheld based on complete chain of circumstantial evidence including motive, recovery of weapons, and FSL reports under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST POA Act, 1989.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gadag, in Special SC/ST Case No.9/2021. The appellant was convicted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Justice for a Heinous Crime: Confirming Death Sentence for Respondent. Upholding the sanctity of law against brutality and greed.

  1. Case Overview Jurisdiction: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Appeals: Confirmation Case No. 1/2022 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Officers for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 170 BNSS. The court held that the police officers were acting in discharge of official duty and no sanction was obtained, hence the FIR is quashed.

The petitioners, three police officers attached to Kharghar Police Station, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 48...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in MCOCA Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Lack of Application of Mind — Proceedings Quashed as Sanction Under Section 23(2) of MCOCA, 1999 Was Granted Without Independent Scrutiny of Material.

The judgment arises from multiple criminal appeals filed by accused persons challenging the validity of proceedings under the Maharashtra Control of O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and COVID-19 Delay. Petitioner's name not in FIR, implicated solely on co-accused statement; trial stalled due to pandemic.

The petitioner, Sri Harish Reddy, filed a second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in Crime No.15/2019 of Kota Police Station, Udupi, for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Surety's Appeal Against Forfeiture of Bond Amount — Reduces Penalty from Rs.40,000 to Rs.5,000. Surety's inability to produce absconding accused does not warrant forfeiture of entire bond amount under Section 446(3) CrPC.

The appellant, Sri Muniyappa, was a surety for accused Nos.1 and 3 in Sessions Case No.56/2016 before the II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tum...