Search Results for "Section 421 Companies Act 2013"

82 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 82 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Due to Court Closure During Limitation Period — Condonation of Delay Granted. The period of court closure during winter vacation is excluded for computing limitation under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, aggrieved by an arbitral award dated 24.08.2016, sought to challenge it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claims — Apportionment of Negligence and Quantum of Compensation Reassessed. The court held the car driver solely negligent and enhanced compensation for injuries and death.

The judgment arises from four appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 13.12.2013 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Winding Up Petition for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice Under Section 434 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner Failed to Prove Respondent's Inability to Pay Debts as Statutory Notice Not Served at Registered Office.

The petitioner, Store One Retail India Ltd., filed a company petition under the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent, Waterfall In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Transfer of Attached Property Void Under Section 64 CPC. Sale of Property by Judgment Debtor After Attachment Order Cannot Defeat Decree Holder's Right to Execute Decree.

The case arises from a First Appeal filed by Mrs. Meera Unnikrishnan, the decree holder, against the dismissal of her execution application by the Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Their Involvement in Company's Business.

The petitioners, including a company and its directors, challenged the order issuing process under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable...