Search Results for "Section 34 Petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Section 34 Petition"

36 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

22 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition. Court holds that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the award was patently illegal for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider the appellant's counterclaim.

14 Mar 2025

The present appeal arises from a commercial dispute between M/s. Strategic Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) and Mphasis Limited (respondent). The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Partially Rejecting Amendment in Section 34 Petition Under Arbitration Act — Amendment Sought After Limitation Period Not Allowed as It Would Introduce New Grounds Beyond Scope of Section 34.

3 Jul 2021

The Appellant, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

4 May 2021

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award — Holds That Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. The Court Reinstated the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Oral Agreement and Quantum of Damages.

20 Apr 2021

The appellant, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned Si...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found in Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Terms. The court held that the arbitrator's construction of the contract was a possible view and not perverse, thus no interference under Section 34(2-A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Mar 2020

The petitioners, Gateway Distriparks Limited and Gateway Rail Freight Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)