Search Results for "Section 337"

521 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge or Intent. Court holds that mere involvement in a road accident without evidence of rash or negligent driving does not attract Section 304 Part II IPC.

The revision petitioner, Kolla Bhovi, was the driver of a lorry involved in a road accident on 20.01.2013, resulting in the death of a cyclist. The co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Identity and Negligence. Concurrent Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Accused Was Driver of KSRTC Bus Involved in Fatal Accident.

The petitioner, Chand Basha, was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bellary, in C.C. No. 165 of 2007 for offences punishable under Sections 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death in Motor Accident Case. Appeal Dismissed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act.

The present appeal was filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. by the original accused No.1, Sanjay Bhavrao @ Baburao Sapkal, challenging his conviction in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Motor Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash Driving. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act as No Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving Was Adduced.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 16 April 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 337 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The applicant, Tatyarao s/o Ganpatrao Tambe, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (Court No.8), Aurangabad in S.C.C. No.3625 of 2001 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Deputy Manager in Indian Airlines Case Due to Lapsed Regulations and Violation of Natural Justice. Regulation 13 of Indian Airlines Service Regulations Held Void for Absence of Enquiry and Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Prabha D. Kannan, a former Deputy Manager (In Flight Services) of Indian Airlines Ltd., challenged her termination from service by an ...