COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.10 OF 2024
2 May 2025...
Search Results for "Section 33(3)"
416 result(s) found
Found 416 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet and Cognizance Order in NIA Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 45 of PMLA. Petitioners were public servants at the time of alleged offences under IPC and Prevention of Destruction of Property Act, 1981, and the court held that prior sanction was mandatory.
29 Apr 2025The petitioners, five police officers, were charge-sheeted by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) for offences under Sections 120B, 143, 145, 147,...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Remitting Land Allotment Matter for Fresh Consideration Due to Procedural Delay. Procedural delay in administrative approval under Rule 176(4) of Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 does not invalidate allotment when no error in decision-making process is shown and petitioner lacks locus standi.
14 Feb 2023The appeals arose from a High Court judgment that set aside land allotment orders and remitted the matter for fresh consideration due to procedural de...
- 198
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Co-operative Bank in Government Securities Scam Case — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Entitlement to Return of Securities or Recovery of Value. The Court held that the plaintiff bank failed to prove its title to the securities and that the transactions were void ab initio due to fraud, and the bank was not entitled to any relief.
7 Apr 2021The appellant, The Amravati Peoples’ Co-operative Bank Ltd. (plaintiff), filed a suit for return of government securities sold by it or in the alter...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Sugar Factory Officials in Prohibition Act Case — Minister's Order Lacks Sanction Under Section 59A. Court holds that prior sanction under Section 59A of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 is mandatory for prosecution of public servants and that a Minister's order without application of mind cannot substitute such sanction.
15 Dec 2017The applicants, Balasaheb Mahadeo Lohar and Rajendra Daulat Dongare, were employees of Gangakhed Sugar & Energy Ltd. They filed a criminal application...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder of Police Driver and Assault on Police Officers. Appellant's Conviction Under Sections 302 and 333 IPC Confirmed Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.
1 Feb 2016The appellant, Mohammed Irshad Kamal Hasan Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.700 of 2003 for...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Not Maintainable in Arbitration Reference Case. Full Bench holds that an order under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 referring parties to arbitration is not appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, as the Arbitration Act is a self-contained code.
27 Nov 2014The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to decide a reference on the maintainability of an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Paten...
- 145
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to Illegible Documents Violating Article 22(5). Supplying illegible documents amounts to non-communication of grounds, depriving detenu of effective representation.
29 Nov 2013The petitioner, Sanjay Soni, challenged a detention order dated 25th January 2012 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...
- 144
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part on Deduction Under Section 80IA and Interest Disallowance Under Section 36(1)(iii) of Income Tax Act. The court upheld ITAT's direction to allow deduction under Section 80IA without deducting depreciation, but reversed the deletion of interest addition for borrowings to sister concern.
28 Jun 2011The case is a tax appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the assessme...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal, Holds CESTAT Has Power to Condon Delay Under Section 129A(5) of Customs Act, 1962. The Court Remanded the Matter for Consideration of Condonation of Delay on Merits, Ruling That Appeals Under Section 129D(3) Are Deemed Appeals Under Section 129A and Thus Subject to the Same Condonation Power.
13 Aug 2010The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) against an order of ...
- 30
