Search Results for "Section 279"

831 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 831 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Student - Compensation Enhanced. Notional income of Rs. 10,000/- upheld, multiplier corrected to 18, future prospects at 40% granted, and conventional heads enhanced under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 02.09.2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Phaltan, in MACP No. 15/2024, where...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction but Reduces Sentence in Rash and Negligent Driving Case. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Maintained While Substantive Imprisonment Reduced to Period Already Served Based on Mitigating Circumstances Including Compensation Payment and Family Situation.

The Supreme Court considered a criminal appeal challenging conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Criminal Case, Modifying Sentence to Fine After 26 Years. Conviction Under Sections 279 and 338 IPC Affirmed, but Imprisonment Substituted with Fine Based on Lapse of Time and Precedent, Citing Harshness of Incarceration After Long Delay.

The appeal arose from a criminal case where the appellant, a bus driver, was convicted for offences under Sections 279, 337, and 338 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving Under IPC Sections 279 and 337 — Conviction Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence Upheld

The applicant, Hamza Mohd. Ibrahim Ansari, was the original accused in C.C.No.769/P/1987 before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 18th Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death and Injuries in Hit-and-Run Case. Revision Petitioner's Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC and Section 134(a)(b) r/w 187 MV Act Confirmed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Was Clear.

The revision petitioner, Mr. Vimanjan Hanumanta Devarkonda, was the original accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident that occurred on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 304(A) and 279 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Rash or Negligent Driving Causing Death.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Bashir Janubhai Pathan, who was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Pathardi, for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Rash Driving Case — Confirms Sentence for Causing Grievous Hurt. Court holds that evidence of injured witnesses and mechanical inspection report sufficiently established rash and negligent driving under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC.

The petitioner, Firoz Mohammed Ali Aga, was the driver of a mini bus (registration no. GA-02/T-4897) that met with an accident on 05/03/2010 near Vadd...