Search Results for "Section 212(6)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Section 212(6)"

34 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Sections 212(6) and 217 of Companies Act, 2013 and Cognizance Order. Petitioners sought declaration that sections unconstitutional and quashing of arrest warrants issued by the Special Court in SFIO complaint.

15 Apr 2024

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Correction of Date of Birth in School Records Based on Municipal Birth Certificate. The court held that a birth certificate under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 is conclusive proof and must be given primacy over school records.

23 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Rushikesh Dullarwar, filed a writ petition aggrieved by the order of the Deputy Director of Education (respondent no.1) declining to c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal Order Reinstating Employee in Service Dispute — Termination Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 5 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The court held that termination without prior approval of the Deputy Director of Education is void and ordered reinstatement with back wages.

21 Mar 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from the same order of the School Tribunal dated 22nd February 1990 in Appeal No.132 of 1988. The fir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of MMC Act, 1888 — Terrace Room Protected But Three Sheds Not Entitled to Injunction. The court held that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favour protecting the three sheds from demolition.

7 Feb 2005

The appellant, Abhinandan Commercial Centre Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court dated 13th January 2005, which partly ...

2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)