Search Results for "Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act"

Trending :

Search Results for "Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act"

264 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Cognizance in Cheque Bounce Case — No Ground to Interfere with Concurrent Findings. Petitioners/accused failed to show any illegality in the order of taking cognizance under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the revisional order rejecting their challenge.

22 Jan 2026

The petitioners, who are the accused in a cheque dishonour case, filed a criminal petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires that demand notice be served on the drawer within 30 days of dishonour; failure to prove service renders complaint not maintainable.

8 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Jai Agarwal and Anjana Agarwal, filed criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (read with Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Company Affairs. Directors Not Vicariously Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Being in Charge of and Responsible for Conduct of Business at Time of Offence.

23 Feb 2023

The case involves an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by three directors (applicants) of CLC Industries Ltd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in NI Act Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. The court held that mere designation as a director is insufficient to attract vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the complaint must contain specific averments that the director was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business.

19 Aug 2022

The case involves an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by Anil Kumar Singhal and Meenu Maheshwari, director...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act Requires Specific Averments of Role in Company Affairs.

14 Aug 2015

The case involves a criminal complaint filed by respondent No. 1 (complainant) under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Vicarious Liability. Section 141 NI Act requires specific averment that the director was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business at the time of offence.

14 Aug 2015

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Director's Application to Quash Process in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations Under Section 141 NI Act. Director Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable Without Averment of Being in Charge of Business Conduct.

14 Aug 2015

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

High Court

High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Vicarious Liability. Director Not Involved in Day-to-Day Affairs of Company Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 r/w 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Role and Responsibility.

14 Aug 2015

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Section 138 rea...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons Against Directors in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Vicarious liability under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be imposed without averring that the director was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business.

25 Apr 2014

The respondent/complainant filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 read with Section 420 of the Indian Pen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses De Novo Trial Requirement Under Section 138 NI Act Upon Transfer of Presiding Judge. The court held that successor judge has discretion to proceed from the stage of transfer but must ensure no prejudice to the accused.

23 Aug 2013

This group of matters involves a common legal question regarding the requirement of a de novo trial in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)