Search Results for "Section 138 Maharashtra Land Revenue Code"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Section 138 Maharashtra Land Revenue Code"

43 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Lease Forfeiture Case, Upholding UPSIDA's Cancellation Order. The forfeiture was justified due to breach of construction timelines under the lease agreement, and the High Court's refusal to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was correct as the dispute was contractual in nature.

6 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute over the forfeiture of an industrial plot lease by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Asserts Jurisdiction in Writ Petition Against Income Tax Demands Post-Transfer of Jurisdiction. Court Holds That Cause of Action Arose in Part Within Its Territory Due to Amalgamation and Transfer Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961, Directing Production of Underlying Orders and Staying Recovery.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a writ petition filed by Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging outstanding income tax demands to...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Suit Under Article 131 for Lack of Cause of Action and Suppression of Material Facts. The suit challenging the validity of notifications under the DSPE Act was held not maintainable as the dispute was not between the State and the Union but between the State and its own officers.

10 Jul 2024

The State of West Bengal filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the Union of India, challenging the validity of notificat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Against Former Directors in GST Case — Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Shedding Corporate Veil. Directors Who Resigned Prior to Tax Period Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Dues Under MGST Act, BST Act, and CST Act Without Lifting Corporate Veil.

22 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Mukesh D. Ramani, Satish D. Sanghavi, and Prakash D. Sanghavi, were former directors of Twin City Organics Pvt. Ltd. They filed writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Boundary Dispute — Appointment of TILR as Court Commissioner Upheld. The court held that in boundary disputes, appointing a revenue officer as commissioner to measure land is permissible and does not constitute collecting evidence, and no substantial question of law arises.

3 Mar 2014

The appellant, Atmaram Ananda Jagrut, filed a second appeal against the judgment and order dated 14.6.2013 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

20 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 36 Renders Complaint Invalid. Court held that prior sanction of the Commissioner is mandatory for prosecution under Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) r/w 36 of the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, and its absence vitiates the criminal proceedings.

6 May 2013

The petitioners, seven residents of Jolly Maker I Cooperative Housing Society in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Manufacturer for Vehicles Used Within Factory Premises — Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Does Not Apply to Vehicles Not Used on Public Roads. The court held that vehicles used solely within factory premises are not 'used in a public place' under Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1958, and demand notices issued without jurisdiction and barred by limitation are illegal.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Tata Motors Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of commercial v...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Demand Notice Within 15 Days of Dishonour, Leading to Quashing of Criminal Proceedings.

2 Feb 2010

The petitioners, six individuals, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Judicial Magistrate First C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs in Multiple Cheque Bounce Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Litigation Mediation Under Section 148 of NI Act. Court holds that failure to refer disputes to mediation before taking cognizance renders criminal proceedings invalid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court dealt with multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)