Search Results for "Sea Customs Act, 1878"

50 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Sanction Order in Disproportionate Assets Case Against IRS Officer — Sanctioning Authority Failed to Apply Independent Mind and Relied on CBI Report Without Proper Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Vivek Batra, an Indian Revenue Service officer, challenged the sanction order dated 09.10.2012 granted by the Union of India for his p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Repugnancy Between Section 28A of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 and Section 299 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Petitioner Contends That District Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Hear Appeal from Probate Revocation.

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the constitutional validity of S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Forfeiture of Property Under SAFEMA Despite Revocation of Detention Order. Property of Detenu Forfeited Under Sections 7 and 19(1) of SAFEMA Upheld as Detention Order Was Valid When Forfeiture Order Was Passed.

The petitioner, Smt. Padma Nirmal Agarwal, challenged the forfeiture of a flat (Flat No.16, 471/C, Manu Mahal, King's Circle, Mumbai) under the Smuggl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Adjudicates Challenge to Declaration of Chandrapur as Dry District Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Order Dated 05.03.2015 and Section 139(1)(a) of the Act Challenged as Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

This batch of writ petitions challenged the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district. The petitioners, holders of licenses under the Maharashtra Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Criminal Appeals Against Conviction in Counterfeit Currency Case Under IPC Sections 489-B, 489-C and 120-B. Conviction Stemmed from Seizure of Fake Indian Currency Notes Valued at Rs.2,00,000, Where Accused Were Allegedly Involved in Trafficking via Courier from Dubai.

The matter pertains to three connected criminal appeals filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the High Court of Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Closure Order for Country Liquor Shop Under Section 142(1) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Licence for Sale of Country Liquor is Not a Fundamental Right and Must Yield to Public Interest.

The petitioner, Satish Damodhar Kasar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Ben...