Search Results for "Schedule III CGST Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Schedule III CGST Act"

52 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.

24 Feb 2026

The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Challenge to GST Demand Confirmation Order. Petition Challenges Order Confirming GST Demand of Rs 70.57 Crores for April 2020 to March 2021.

30 Jun 2025

The petitioner, GlobeOp Financial Services (India) Private Limited (the surviving entity after its merger with GlobeOp Financial Services Technologies...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notices in GST Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Section 75(4) of CGST Act — Mandatory Personal Hearing Requirement Not Waived. The court held that the requirement of personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is mandatory and failure to provide such opportunity vitiates the proceedings.

22 Apr 2024

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by individual taxpayers challenging show cause notices and orders passed under the Central Goods...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

24 Aug 2023

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant's Appeal Against High Court's Jurisdiction Finding in GST Notification Challenge. High Court of Sikkim Lacked Territorial Jurisdiction as Cause of Action for Challenging Goa's GST Notification Arose in Goa, Not Sikkim, Under Article 226(2) of the Constitution.

14 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from writ petitions filed before the High Court of Sikkim by a private limited company engaged in the lottery ticket business, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Service Tax Levy on Irrigation Restoration Charges Paid to State Government. State's Collection of Charges for Water Diversion is a Sovereign Function, Not a Taxable Service Under Finance Act, 1994.

13 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Rattan India Power Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SVLDRS-3 Demand for Interest Component Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme. Interest paid under protest prior to show cause notice is part of tax dues under Section 124(2) of Finance Act, 2019.

13 Jan 2023

The Petitioner, National Centre for the Performing Arts, a public trust registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and engaged in providin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Bifurcation of Interest and Service Charges. Tribunal's finding that no service tax liability arises prior to 01.03.2006 due to absence of mechanism for bifurcation of value of service from interest amount upheld.

12 Feb 2021

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order of the Cust...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes NAA Order Against McDonald's Franchisee in GST Anti-Profiteering Case — Failure to Consider Input Tax Credit Benefit and Lack of Proper Investigation. The court held that the National Anti-Profiteering Authority must consider the benefit of input tax credit and conduct a proper investigation before directing deposit of profiteered amount under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

1 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd., operates McDonald's restaurants in Western and Southern India. After the GST rate on restaurant serv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Leasing of Wagons to Railways. Leasing of Wagons to Railways Constitutes 'Supply of Tangible Goods Services' Under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Finance Act, 1994.

18 Apr 2019

The Commissioner of CGST, ST & Central Excise filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order dated 05/04/201...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)