Search Results for "Rule 58(4)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rule 58(4)"

346 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 346 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement Age Reduction for Government Employees — Rule of Promulgation and Publication of Statutory Rules Upheld. Reduction of retirement age from 60 to 58 years invalid due to non-publication of amended rules under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.

6 May 2011

The petitioners, five retired government employees of the Public Works Department in Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

Supreme Court

Seniority Dispute – Kerala Water Authority – Special Rules 1960 – Subordinate Service Rules 1966 – Promotion Quotas – Degree vs. Diploma Quota – Applicability of Rule 4(b) – Supreme Court Overturns High Court Ruling. Promotion and Seniority – Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Special Rules 1960 and Subordinate Service Rules 1966 in Kerala Water Authority Employment Disputes

18 Mar 2025

The Kerala Public Health Engineering Service Special Rules, 1960 and Subordinate Service Rules, 1966 govern separate services. Seniority must be dete...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Reserved Order on Petition to Quash Criminal Case Against ACC Directors for Legal Metrology Act Violations. Non-Impleadment of Company and Lack of Inquiry Under Section 202 Cr.P.C. Raised as Key Grounds.

20 Sep 2021

The criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) was filed by ACC Limited, a cement manufacturer, and its Man...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Rejection of Plaint and Decree on Counterclaim. Court holds that rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC does not require notice to plaintiff and that counterclaim can be decreed ex parte if plaintiff fails to appear.

24 Feb 2010

The appellants, Smt. Vijaya Wd/o Vijay Vitthalani and her minor children, filed a suit for specific performance of contract and injunction against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order Directing Execution Court to Follow Order 21 CPC for Judgment-Debtors' Objections to Consent Decree. The petition concerns execution of a consent eviction decree under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, where the judgment-debtors claimed the decree was void due to non-joinder of the landlord.

21 Jul 2017

The petitioner, a monthly tenant of certain premises, sub-let the same to the respondent firm for running a school. Alleging unauthorized commercial u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement — Delay of 9 years and 79 days condoned subject to costs of Rs.15,000/- as sufficient cause shown and no prejudice caused to plaintiff.

10 Oct 2019

The petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.21,00,000/- paid as part consideration for purchase of a flat. The suit was dismissed in defa...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.

31 Jan 2019

The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...

High Court

KAHC010366622012_1

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Leave Petitions Despite Past Overstay, Holding That Past Abscondence Cannot Be a Permanent Bar. The court ruled that each application must be considered on its own merits under the Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, and set aside the rejection orders for reconsideration.

25 Feb 2005

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by convicts Ramchandra Raghu Naik and Bindu Ramchandra More, challenging the rejection of thei...

High Court

High Court Quashes Income Tax Assessment Orders for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Draft Order Requirement Under Section 144C of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that issuance of draft assessment order under Section 144C(1) is mandatory for eligible assessees where variation arises from Transfer Pricing Officer order under Section 92CA(3), and non-compliance renders final order void ab initio, even after remand under Section 263.

6 Jan 2026

The dispute involved a pharmaceutical company challenging assessment orders passed by the Income Tax Department for Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)