Search Results for "Rule 330"

376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits of Retired Lecturer Under Maharashtra Pension Rules. Petitioner entitled to regular pension, gratuity, commutation, and leave encashment with interest for 30 years 1 month of service in aided colleges.

The petitioner, Dr. (Mrs.) Parvathi Venkatesh, a retired lecturer aged about 60 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Adverse Possession Claim Fails as Appellants Failed to Prove Continuous Hostile Possession for Over 12 Years Under Section 100 CPC.

The present appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a suit for permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Asian Paints VAT Case — Input Tax Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Despite Non-Use in Manufacturing. Section 11(4) of KVAT Act, 2003 does not restrict ITC on capital goods used for generation of electricity for own consumption.

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) read with Section 9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment Before Judgment in Recovery Suit by Financial Institutions. Non-Compliance With Order 38 Rule 5A CPC Does Not Invalidate Order Absent Prejudice.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by financial institutions (respondents 2 to 12) against J.K. Synthetics Limited (appellant) for recovery of dues. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Co-operative Bank's Recovery Proceedings Under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — Petitioners Failed to Establish That They Were Not Members of the Society or That the Dispute Was Not Maintainable.

The petitioners, Rahul L. Khope and Laxmikant Khope, filed writ petitions before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the recovery proceedings ...