Search Results for "Rule 28A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Re...

Search Results for "Rule 28A"

59 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 59 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Prosecution in Drugs & Cosmetics Act Case Due to Procedural Violations and Non-Compliance with Statutory Mandates. Prosecution was invalidated because of inordinate delay in sample testing, failure to dispatch sample portion to manufacturer depriving retesting right, and improper cognizance by Special Judge without committal under Section 193 CrPC, under Section 27(d) of Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940.

24 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in its criminal appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of I...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India Grants Pensionary Benefits to Appellant After 25-Year-Long Litigation. Court Condemns Failure of Departmental Inquiry and Upholds Employee’s Right to Pension

25 Feb 2025

Constitution of India, 1950 (COI) — Article 226 — High Court's Power of Judicial Review — High Court’s dismissal of writ petition and review a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Removal of Encroachments on Siddapura Lotus Pond. Court Directs Authorities to Protect Water Body as Public Trust Asset Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

27 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Whitefield Rising Trust, a charitable trust, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Cause of Action Disclosed. Court holds that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC if it discloses a cause of action, even if the claim may ultimately fail on merits.

19 Jun 2019

The judgment pertains to a Notice of Motion filed by defendant No.1 in a suit for specific performance. The defendant sought rejection of the plaint u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Probate Grant in Will Execution Dispute — No Suspicious Circumstances Found. The court upheld the probate of a Will executed by the testator in favor of his brothers, rejecting claims of suspicious circumstances under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

11 Jan 2019

The case involves an appeal against the grant of probate of a Will executed by the late Narrottam Sahgal. The appellants, who are the legal heirs of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Held Validly Taken Despite Existence of Structures. Panchnama and Rapat Sufficient to Constitute Taking of Possession Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jan 2019

The State of Haryana appealed against the High Court's judgment that declared the acquisition of the respondent's land as lapsed under Section 24(2) o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Kerosene Dealers' Association Challenging Inclusion of VAT in Ceiling Price. State's Power to Fix Maximum Price Including Taxes Upheld Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

10 Sep 2015

The petitioners, Mumbai Kerosene Dealers' Association and its members, who are wholesale kerosene dealers holding licences under the Maharashtra Keros...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Invalidation of Thakur Scheduled Tribe Claim. Petitioner failed to prove her caste claim due to lack of contemporaneous documentary evidence and contradictory school records.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Sangita Sahebrao Bhalerao, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 06/07/2011 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions for Waghadi Project — Upholds Right to Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Landowners Granted Enhanced Compensation with Solatium and Interest for Agricultural Lands Acquired for Minor Irrigation Work.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns a batch of seven writ petitions filed by landowners whose agricultural lands were acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the W...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)