Search Results for "Rule 18A"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Anticipatory Bail to Mother-in-Law in Triple Talaq Case — Section 7(c) of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 Does Not Bar Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC. Offence Under the Act Can Only Be Committed by Muslim Husband, Not Mother-in-Law.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court rejecting an anticipatory bail application filed by the appellant, the mother-in-law of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Court holds that mere use of caste name without intent to insult does not attract Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, Appoji Reddy and K.V. Subramani, accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No.104/2020 registered by Srinivaspura Police Station, Kolar, filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting of Drug Manufacturer for Supplying Sub-Standard Cream Due to Reliance on Erroneous Test Report. Appellate Lab Report Under Section 25(4) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Held Conclusive, Ignoring It Renders Decision Perverse.

The appellant, Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd., supplied Clotrimazole Cream 1% 15 gm tubes to the respondent, Post Graduate Institute of Medica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes Civil Imprisonment for Breach of Injunction Due to Lack of Knowledge of Injunction Order. The court held that under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, knowledge of the injunction order must be proved before punishing for breach.

The petitioners, Dr. Vinod Babarao Rode and Sou. Varsha Vinod Rode, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15.10.2010 passed by the trial co...