Search Results for "Rule 17(8)"

720 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 720 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Delhi High Court’s Unconditional Stay of Money Decree Under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC. Execution of Trademark Infringement Money Decree Stayed Without Deposit Pending Appeal, Upheld by Apex Court Citing Sufficient Cause.

The dispute arose from a civil suit instituted by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and anor, claiming to be the proprietor of the Beverly Hills Polo Club trade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Based on Unregistered Will — Revenue Authorities Directed to Delete Entry and Restore Original Names. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Revenue Authorities Must Follow Procedure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, thirteen residents of Ghatshendra, Kannad, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation of their names in the revenue records in re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Marriage Dissolution Case — Remand Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Finding. Section 2(2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 bars application to Scheduled Tribes unless custom is proved; court must first decide applicability of Act before remanding.

The appellant, Narayana Naik, and the respondent, Smt. Leelavathi N., belong to the Marathi Community, which is a Scheduled Tribe. Their marriage was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Marriage Dissolution Case — Remand Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Finding. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 applies to Scheduled Tribes unless custom to the contrary is proved under Section 2(2).

The appellant, Narayana Naik, and the respondent, Smt. Leelavathi N., belong to the Marathi Community, which is a Scheduled Tribe. Their marriage was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Possession Upheld. Court holds that the plaintiff's possession over suit plots was established through evidence and the defendants failed to prove their title or prior possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate cou...