Search Results for "Rule 14-A"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Cooperative Society Property Dispute. Petitioners Failed to Prove Possession Over Suit Property, No Prima Facie Case Established for Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.11.2024 passed by the District Judge-1, Karad, which dismissed their appeal again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Inter-University Transfer Pay Fixation Case — Discrimination Found in Denial of Promotion Benefits. The Court held that denying pay fixation benefits to an employee transferred between universities, while granting them to others, violates the principle of equal treatment.

The case involves two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court, which reversed a Single Bench order that had allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Sarpanch in Corruption Case. Registration of FIR and arrest under Prevention of Corruption Act constitutes disgraceful conduct under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, justifying removal without awaiting conviction.

The petitioner, Dr. Narendra Purushottam Ingole, was elected as a Member of Gram Panchayat Wadki in June 2015 and subsequently elected as Sarpanch. A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Elected Member for Being Voter in Two Village Panchayats. Voters List Held Conclusive Evidence Under Section 16(1)(i) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Suryakant Shivaji Munde, contested and won the election for a reserved seat (Other Backward Class) from Ward No. 4 of Kesapuri Village...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Educational Institution Challenging Provident Fund Applicability. Establishment Not Exempt Under Section 16(1)(a) or (b) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 as It Uses Power and Employs More Than 20 Persons.

The appellant, M/s. Aniket College of Social Work, is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and the Maharashtra Public Trust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when both lower courts have concurrently found that the appellant failed to prove title or adverse possession over the suit property.

The appellant, Dilipkumar Bherumal Kucheriya, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment ...