Search Results for "Retrospective"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Retrospective"

1104 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1104 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute - Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction For Non-Notified Properties, Civil Court Retains Authority For Property Status Determination.

28 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against Respondents, setting aside the High Court order and allowing the application under Or...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal on Retrospective Registration Under Section 12AA of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Tribunal's Retrospective Grant Set Aside. Registration Under Section 12AA Can Only Be Prospective from Date of Application, Not Retrospective.

21 Jan 2026

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 09.08.2011....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Telecom Infrastructure Charges Case Over Retrospective Application. Appellant's Circular Increasing Charges from 2009 Held Invalid as Yearly Payments Are Made Upfront, Making Retrospective Burden Unreasonable Under Interconnection Agreements.

22 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from appeals filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. challenging a judgment by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Incentive Withdrawal Case — Policy Change Upheld as Prospective and in Public Interest. The Court held that the impugned notification was not retrospective and promissory estoppel did not bar the government from modifying the incentive scheme for Kutch industries.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India against the common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had quashed Notificatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

6 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Injunction Restraining Chairman and Managing Director from Functioning in Company Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction as plaintiff failed to establish that defendant's appointment was invalid or that he was acting against company interests.

8 Feb 2016

The appellant, Sridhar Sundararajan, filed an appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16th July 2015, which dismissed his Notice of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit Seeking Removal of Managing Director on Ground of Age Limit Under Companies Act, 2013. Section 196(3)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 Held Not Retrospective and Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Appointments.

16 Jul 2015

The plaintiff, a director of Ultramarine & Pigments Limited, filed a suit seeking an order to restrain the 2nd defendant, the Chairman and Managing Di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Levy of Supervision Costs Under Bombay Prohibition Act. Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Costs from Liquor Licensee Quashed as Without Statutory Authority Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

24 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Vidarbha Liquor Corporation, a partnership firm holding a liquor license, challenged the retrospective levy and recovery of super...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Antidumping Duty Gap Period Case. Tribunal's Decision That No Antidumping Duty Can Be Levied During Period Between Expiry of Provisional Duty and Imposition of Final Duty Under Rule 21 of Customs Tariff (Antidumping) Rules, 1995 Upheld.

15 Dec 2011

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed appeals against orders of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 1 Aug...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Negotiable Instruments Act Case - Holds Amended Provisions Apply Retrospectively to Pending Complaints. The court ruled that procedural amendments under the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 apply to all pending complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, regardless of the date of filing.

21 Sep 2005

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by M/s. Indraprastha Holdings Ltd., the complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Ne...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)