Search Results for "Recall of Witness"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Recall of Witness"

43 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Recall Witness in Partition Suit. Trial Court's Discretion to Reject Application Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Upheld as Not Perverse.

6 Jan 2026

The case arises from a civil revision petition filed by defendants 2 and 5 in a partition suit (O.S.No.53 of 2022) pending before the Additional Distr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Witness and Additional Documents in Commercial Suit — Upholds Liberal Approach Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. Party Seeking to Place on Record E-Mails and Recall PW-1 for Cross-Examination Must Be Permitted to Ensure Fair Trial and Effective Adjudication.

1 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from a Professional Services Agreement dated 19th February 2013 between M/s. Levitate Mobile Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (LMT), the appel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Recall of Victim for Cross-Examination in POCSO Case — Right to Fair Trial Prevails Over Delay Concerns. The court held that the right to cross-examine is a fundamental part of a fair trial and that Section 311 CrPC confers wide discretion to recall a witness if essential for just decision, setting aside the trial court's rejection of the recall application.

13 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Chandrakant @ Kantu, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination in Civil Suit — Procedural Rules Subserve Justice. Inherent powers under Section 151 CPC can be invoked to recall a witness for cross-examination when counsel was delayed due to unavoidable circumstances, as rules of procedure are handmaids of justice.

12 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Michelle Rejji Cope, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the trial court refusing to recall a witness for cross-examination...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Witness in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 311 CrPC for Effective Cross-Examination. Petitioner Accused Granted Opportunity to Recall Complainant's Witness to Ensure Fair Trial and Just Decision.

1 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Kavita Agrawal, was the accused in a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pending before the Judic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence in Civil Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Upheld as Defendants Had Sufficient Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witness.

25 Aug 2011

The petitioners, who were the original defendants in Special Civil Suit No.74/2010 pending before the Second Joint Civil Judge, Satara, filed four wri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Prosecutrix for Cross-Examination in Gang Rape Case Due to Advocate's Inefficiency. Accused Granted Opportunity to Bring Omissions and Contradictions on Record Under Section 311 CrPC.

9 Aug 2011

The applicants, Mansaram Shaligram Sawalkar and Bisram Baliram Mawaskar, were accused in Sessions Trial No. 7 of 2010 for the offence punishable under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Petition to Recall Complainant's Evidence in Cheque Dishonour Case — Right to Cross-Examination Upheld. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Cross-Examine Complainant's Evidence Amounts to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

4 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Nandkumar Rajkumar Harane, was the original accused in a complaint filed by respondent Vishwas Vilasrao Kshirsagar under Section 138 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recalling Witness in Election Petition — No Power to Recall Witness After Cross-Examination Under CPC and Representation of the People Act, 1951. The court held that Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC does not permit recall of a witness for further cross-examination after discharge, and inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be invoked to circumvent specific provisions.

30 Nov -0001

The case arises from an election petition filed by Ravindra Ramji Mundhe (petitioner) challenging the election of Avadhoot Anil Tatkare (respondent No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Trust Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for recall of witness under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, as the application was filed after a long delay and lacked bona fides.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Sau. Sumita Pradeepkumar Dixit (original defendant No. 4) against the Gangadhar Makharia Chari...

2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)