Search Results for "Railway service"

1297 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1297 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Contract. Court holds that Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 prescribing 3% performance guarantee is binding and demand for 10% is arbitrary.

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietorship concern, responded to a tender notice dated 01.03.2023 issued by the Nagpur Division of Central Rai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway Appeal in Untoward Incident Compensation Case. Deceased was a bona fide passenger who fell while boarding train, covered under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, against an award of compensation by the Rail...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Protection Force Constable for Gross Neglect of Duty and Abuse of Authority. High Court's Reinstatement Order Set Aside for Exceeding Writ Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

The case arose from disciplinary proceedings against Rajendra Kumar Dubey, a Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), who was charged with gro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Railway Accident Death Case. Claimants failed to establish wrongful act, neglect or default on part of railway administration to claim compensation over and above the statutory amount under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Siju S. Vallikalayil, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Order for Payment of Subsistence Allowance to Suspended Railway Employee. Employer's Failure to Pay Subsistence Allowance During Suspension Period Renders Subsequent Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid.

The Union of India, through the Chief Workshop Manager of Central Railway, Parel, Mumbai, filed two writ petitions challenging orders of the Central G...